High Court quashes superstore plans for the third time
News | 2 June 2015
Planning procedures can sometimes appear infuriatingly circular and never ending. In one extreme case, the High Court has – for the third time – overturned planning consent granted for a superstore on the outskirts of a Gloucestershire town.
Planning procedures can sometimes appear infuriatingly circular and never ending. In one extreme case, the High Court has – for the third time – overturned planning consent granted for a superstore on the outskirts of a Gloucestershire town.

The plans had been consistently opposed by a town centre retailer who feared that the superstore would take away half of its turnover and lead to its closure. Following judicial review proceedings, the Court had identified legal flaws in planning permissions granted in 2012 and 2013 and both had been quashed.
The local authority again granted consent in 2014 and the retailer again challenged the decision. In quashing the permission, the Court found that a planning officer’s report, on which councillors based their decision, had not adequately informed them of the true extent of the harm that the superstore would inflict on the retailer and the viability and vitality of the town centre in general.
Contact: Yildiz Betez
Related News & Insights
-
Thackray Williams announces fifteen promotions across the firm and its paralegal career progression
News | 1 April 2026
-
Thackray Williams’ contribution to women’s football celebrated
News | 10 March 2026
-
Family Law Christmas Drinks
Events | 3 December 2025
-
New Thackray Williams sails boost junior sailing success at Chipstead Lakes near Sevenoaks
News | 3 November 2025