- Written by
- James Millican, Paralegal
In the recent ruling of Z v Y ([2024] EAT 63), the Claimant worked for the Respondent, (a local council,) as a risk and statistical data advisor in the fire and rescue service. She resigned from her job after a long period of sickness absence, and after she had resigned, she issued a tribunal claim.
Her claim form included various discrimination claims and stated: ‘I was Constructively Dismissed by [the Respondent] on 1st June 2018 – the last act of discrimination’. The parties agreed a list of issues, which referred to constructive unfair dismissal, but not to discriminatory unfair dismissal.
The tribunal concluded that the Claimant had been constructively dismissed, and that she had resigned directly because of conduct that was discriminatory and breached trust and confidence. Several of the discrimination allegations were upheld, however, the ET held that they did not have to consider whether the dismissal itself was discriminatory. They found 'it was never one of the tribunal’s issues that this was a discriminatory dismissal'. This meant that the allegations could not count as a ‘continuing act’ ending in dismissal and were out of time.
The Employment Appeal Tribunal held that a tribunal should look behind an agreed list of issues when considering whether a Claimant’s discrimination claim includes a claim of discriminatory constructive dismissal. The ET was found to have limited itself to the list of issues. The ET should have considered the claim of discriminatory constructive dismissal which was clearly included in the Claimant’s claim form. The EAT substituted their finding for one of discriminatory constructive dismissal.
The EAT did, however, remit the issue of whether the preceding allegations of discrimination formed ‘conduct extending over a period’ leading to the discriminatory dismissal, as they had run out of time.
See below for the case judgement:
If you are facing an Employment Tribunal and looking for legal advice, please contact us on 020 8290 0440 and ask to speak to a member of our Employment team.
Related Insights
-
Understanding Whistleblower Protections: Case Analysis of Nicol v World Travel and Tourism
News | 3 April 2024
-
Government to regulate duration of non-compete clauses
News | 15 August 2023
-
Government confirms consultation on calculating holiday entitlement for part-year and irregular hours workers
News | 13 January 2023
-
Ikea cuts sick pay for unvaccinated staff forced to self-isolate
Advice | 10 January 2022
-
Redundancy following protected disclosures is not automatically unfair
News | 22 November 2021
-
COVID-19 adjusted right to work checks process extended from 16 May 2021 to 20 June 2021
News | 19 May 2021