Landlord and tenant: assured shorthold tenancies
News | 2 February 2015
The Court of Appeal has held that a landlord was not required to pay a rent deposit in respect of an assured shorthold tenancy into an authorised scheme, where there was no authorised scheme at the time the deposit was received.
The Court of Appeal has held that a landlord was not required to pay a rent deposit in respect of an assured shorthold tenancy (AST) into an authorised scheme, where there was no authorised scheme at the time the deposit was received.
However, the landlord could only make use of the procedure in section 21 of the Housing Act 1988 to end the AST if the deposit was returned to the tenant, or possibly if it had been protected in an authorised scheme at the time the notice was served.
Any landlords still holding tenancy deposits received before 6 April 2007 will be relieved that the court had no hesitation in finding that there is no direct obligation to register those deposits.
Contact: Andrew Raby
Related News & Insights
-
Thackray Williams announces fifteen promotions across the firm and its paralegal career progression
News | 1 April 2026
-
Thackray Williams’ contribution to women’s football celebrated
News | 10 March 2026
-
New Thackray Williams sails boost junior sailing success at Chipstead Lakes near Sevenoaks
News | 3 November 2025
-
NetWalking at Penshurst Place and Gardens
Events | 31 October 2025